This interactive reading-comprehension exercise about a music review is part of a complete lesson on the vocabulary of music in our free upper-intermediate English course.
Read the following review of Taylor Swift’s 1989 and the glossary then answer the questions below.
Genre: Pop/R&B
Label: Republic
Reviewed: October 30, 2023
Taylor Swift’s latest re-record, 1989 (Taylor’s Version), closely mirrors the original, but the inclusion of five previously unreleased tracks provide additional insight into her groundbreaking pop debut. This is the latest of her albums that Swift has re-recorded, with the objective of taking ownership of her own work, after she was unable to take ownership of the original recordings. By recording and releasing the albums again and clearly distinguishing between the original recordings and the new, she has effectively reclaimed her work (and the revenue that it creates) from the industry that didn’t want to sell the original studio master recordings back to her.
In 2014, Taylor Swift transformed into a pop sensation with her fifth album, “1989.” Platinum success, a stage show that featured models as backing dancers, and a diamond covered microphone marked her shift from intimate country based songwriting to bright, punchy pop. Despite being her first official pop album, it dominated charts and earned Grammy acclaim, receiving ten nominations and winning the Grammy for Album of the Year. This win established Swift as the first woman to ever win the award twice, after previously having won with her album “Fearless”. Swift would go on to win a third Grammy for best album with “Folklore” in 2021.
The re-record, 1989 (Taylor’s Version), sheds light on this time in the artist’s life, providing additional context. The added tracks range from impressive to weak, offering glimpses into Swift’s vulnerability. While lacking the precision of the original, they reveal a more human side, adding depth and detail behind Taylor’s superficially pleasing aesthetic.
Though 1989 (Taylor’s Version) may lack some of her signature nuances, the vault tracks occasionally suffer from being too wordy. Despite this, Swift’s ability to encapsulate the complex emotions post-breakup remains a standout. The title of one track, “‘Slut!,’” may mislead; it delicately explores hiding relationships from tabloid scrutiny.
The most remarkable addition, “Say Don’t Go,” co-written with Diane Warren stands, out with its tense atmosphere, bridging the ’80s influence of 1989 and the angst of Red. This song in particular demonstrates Swift’s musical evolution.
Collaborating mostly with Jack Antonoff, the absences of master songwriter Max Martin and former collaborator Shellback are noticeable. While some new songs could fit Antonoff’s later work, they may be fragments developed much later. Despite stylistic changes, the vault tracks provide context, making the original songs more understandable.
The extended runtime of 1989, now about 81 minutes, helps balance its cloying moments. Songs like “Welcome to New York” gain depth against wearier breakup tracks. However, not every song benefits; “Bad Blood” feels more basic, and “How You Get the Girl” retains its saccharine sweetness. The inclusion of the new songs adds to rather than detracts from the themes of nostalgia, love, and resilience that tie the tracks together, creating a cohesive listening experience
Despite any flaws, the record’s high points remain intact, showcasing Swift’s songwriting prowess. While some may consider 1989 artistically inferior, its enduring songs prove otherwise. 1989 (Taylor’s Version) doesn’t wear a debutante smile like the original version, but it hasn’t lost its appeal.
Text adapted under fair use from Pitchfork.
When you have finished reading the music review, try to answer all of the reading comprehension questions below.
You can use the numbered buttons to navigate between the questions. When you have finished, click the “finish” button. Click the view questions button when you have finished to review the solutions and your answers.